Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39586902›Full record

ReviewPediatric cardiology2026

PDA Stenting for Ductal-Dependent Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease: History and View From 10,000 Feet.

John W Moore

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John W MooreEmeritus UC San Diego School of Medicine, 9640 Deer Trail Drive, San Diego, CA, 92127, USA. jwmmoore1950@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1079-1200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides a historical review and a current perspective on the procedures used to palliate cyanosis in ductal-dependent infants. Eighty years ago, Helen Taussig, Alfred Blalock and Vivien Thomas developed the first effective treatment. The Blalock-Taussig-Thomas (BTT) shunt is the historical predecessor of both the contemporary modified BTT shunt and interventional stenting of the Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA). The surgical shunt was firmly established therapy before catheterization was born, and PDA stenting was not possible until the technologies designed to address coronary heart disease were developed. The momentum of long-established surgical therapy inhibited clinical development of PDA stenting. Nevertheless, available clinical outcomes, though limited, appear to favor PDA stenting, and first-line therapy may be shifting from the modified BTT shunt to PDA stenting. More definitive data should arise from a randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

Blalock-Taussig ProcedureCyanosisDuctus Arteriosus, PatentHeart Defects, CongenitalStentsCardiac CatheterizationHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansBlalock-Taussig-Thomas shuntCyanotic congenital heart diseasePDA stent

Identifiers

PMID39586902
PMCPMC13498521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.