ArticleThe AAPS journal2024
Recommendation for Clarifying FDA Policy in Evaluating "Sameness" of Higher Order Structure for Generic Peptide Therapeutics.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recognizing the approach of a dramatic expansion of peptide therapeutics reaching the marketplace in recent years, led by GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide and liraglutide, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) branch of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final guidance in 2021 that was intended to assist generic drug producers in meeting Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) obligations to establish "sameness" of their active peptide drug relative to that produced by innovator companies. Research and a published report by FDA scientists on best practices followed, which promulgated the use of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and principal component analysis (PCA) and established a quantitative standard by which "sameness" of higher order structure for the applicant's peptide drug could be judged. A key requirement is that drug product samples be analyzed directly and non-invasively, a condition which in practice restricts sample modification to the addition of a small amount of deuterium oxide to allow signal lock and spectral data alignment (as required for NMR analysis). In the study described herein, data are presented to illustrate that 1) relatively small differences in sample pH can cause significant shifting of certain proton resonances, 2) that such resonance shifting is readily reversible and due to the degree of protonation of specific amino acid residues (rather than reflecting differences in higher order structure), and 3) that small differences in pH variability between sample cohorts can frequently cause failure to meet the quantitative benchmark established by the agency. Methodology is presented by which drug sample pHs can be aligned with minimal impact, and a recommendation is made that minor sample pH adjustments be allowed in assessing "sameness" of peptide drug higher order structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39586870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.