ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Management of Breast Cancer by Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction by Prepectoral Implant Approach with Polypropylene Mesh for Patients with Large Breasts.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prepectoral versus Retropectoral Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction after Skin-reducing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Evaluating Scopus AI Versus Traditional Searches for Literature Review About Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: An Exploratory Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the feasibility and outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction using a dermal sling and polypropylene mesh for fixation after skin-reducing mastectomy with prepectoral prosthesis placement in patients with large breasts who were diagnosed with cancer.
methodsThis retrospective study included demographic and clinical data from female patients with breast cancer and large breasts, who were candidates for skin-reducing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Data regarding operative technique, implant size, operative duration, and intraoperative complications were retrieved. Early and late postoperative complications were recorded. Routine assessment of postoperative patient satisfaction was performed using the Breast Reconstruction Satisfaction Questionnaire.
resultsThe study included data from 49 female patients with a mean (± SD) age of 40.88 ± 8.03 years; the mean follow-up was 31.5 ± 8.1 months. The operation was successful in 47 (95.9%) patients, whereas reconstruction failed in 2. Capsule contracture occurred in 9 (18.4%) patients, 4 of whom required capsulectomy. Severe wound infections occurred in 2 (4.1%) patients, 1 of whom was treated conservatively. Implant exposure occurred in 2 (4.1%) patients, 1 of which was managed using a skin rotational flap. Five (10.2%) patients experienced mildly impaired range of motion. Forty-four (90.0%) patients reported postoperative satisfaction, with 3 expressing satisfaction only when postoperative complications were treated.
conclusionsThe prepectoral approach using a combined synthetic mesh and dermal sling yielded a good solution for patients with large breasts. The technique was associated with minimal complications, yielded good postoperative patient satisfaction, and is affordable. The results of using a synthetic mesh appeared to be equivalent to those of ADM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39586862What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.