Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39586847›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Real-world therapy and persistence of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema: a German claims data analysis.

Julia Krieger, Oliver Cox, Jan-Paul Flacke, Lena Beilschmidt, Sabrina Mueller, Ulf Maywald, Michael Janusz Koss

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Opportunities to Improve Management of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: Communication at Diagnosis and Beyond : Insights from the German nAMD Barometer Survey.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia KriegerCytel Inc., Potsdamer Straße 58, 10785, Berlin, Germany.
Oliver CoxF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070, Basel, Switzerland. oliver.cox@roche.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2308-7837
Jan-Paul FlackeRoche Pharma AG, Emil-Barell-Straße 1, 79639, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.
Lena BeilschmidtRoche Pharma AG, Emil-Barell-Straße 1, 79639, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.
Sabrina MuellerIPAM E.V., Alter Holzhafen 19, 23966, Wismar, Germany.
Ulf MaywaldPayers GmbH, Heilwigstraße 34, 20249, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael Janusz KossEye Center Nymphenburger Höfe, Augenklinik Herzog Carl Theodor, Nymphenburger Str. 4, 80335, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition is the current and high-volume standard-of-care for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) with diabetic macular edema (DME). This study assessed the impact of non-persistence in anti-VEGF treatment using claims data from two German states.

methodsThis study identified adults with nAMD or DR/DME and incident anti-VEGF treatment (= index) in January 2015-June 2019 using the German AOK PLUS claims database (January 2014-June 2021, ~ 3.5 million insured). Baseline characteristics were observed within 12 months before index. Patient follow-up lasted ≥ 24 months or until death. Non-persistence (gap of ≥ 180 days) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Cox regression identified variables linked to non- persistence. The study analysed reimbursed anti-VEGF treatments, thus excluding off-label use of bevacizumab.

results5,498 patients diagnosed with nAMD (mean age, 80.09 years; male, 37.50%; mean Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] score, 3.07) and 484 patients with DR/DME (mean age, 67.14; male, 58.88%; mean CCI score, 4.54) were identified. Non-persistence to anti-VEGF treatment within 12 months after index occurred in 51.38% of nAMD patients and 62.60% of DR/DME patients, with mean times to first gap of 11.28 and 8.98 months, respectively. Cox regression revealed factors associated with non-persistence, including higher age, female gender, higher care needs, longer AMD history, and the use of ranibizumab.

conclusionEpidemiologic and ophthalmologic factors associated with anti-VEGF non-persistence were successfully identified in the first year of therapy. The analyzed dataset can potentially be enriched with additional health insurance database sets under the used criteria to gain more understanding of anti-VEGF non-persistence.

Indexed as

BevacizumabDiabetic RetinopathyMacular EdemaRanibizumabVisual AcuityWet Macular DegenerationAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsDatabases, FactualFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAdherenceAdministrative dataAnti-vascular endothelial growth factorDiabetic retinopathyNeovascular age-related macular degenerationPersistence

Identifiers

PMID39586847
PMCPMC11953213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.