Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39586841›Full record

ReviewAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2025

Mixed Strain Fermentation and Metabonomics for Solving Issues of Bioproduction.

Elias Hakalehto, Reino Laatikainen, Jouni Pesola, Erik Dahlquist, Jeremy Everett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elias HakalehtoUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Reino LaatikainenSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Jouni PesolaUniversity of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Erik DahlquistSchool of Business Society and Engineering, Division of Sustainable Energy Systems, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
Jeremy EverettSchool of Science within the Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the research of mixed microbial cultures, the numbers and identifications of individual strains are often only partially unknown. Their metabolic capabilities are also not wholly predictable especially if the joint potential is to be understood. In these kinds of situations, deeper insight into the variable microbial communities cannot be obtained by genetic analysis only. Even more critical than the taxonomic aspect is usually the functional metabolic outcome of the mixed flora in question. The results from such studies as NMR (nucleic magnetic resonance) give a precise view from versatile angles into the biochemical activities during the multiparametric metabolic responses of the microflora as a whole.Originally, metabonomics was mainly used for the pathophysiological research of various microbes or for recording the genetic or biochemical modifications of mixed microflora. This approach offers a tool for monitoring changes in microscopic or otherwise confined ecosystems or at multiple locations from which representative specimens are difficult to obtain. It also offers repeatability in various processes. In microbiological studies, the research group can attain overall views on variable populations and their alterations in time and space.

Indexed as

BacteriaFermentationMetabolomeMetabolomicsMicrobial ConsortiaBacteriological intestinal balanceFunctional analysisMicrobial biochemistryMicrobial communitiesNucleic magnetic resonance

Identifiers

PMID39586841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.