Trial reportJournal of dental research2025
Comparison of Implant Precision with Robots, Navigation, or Static Guides.
Trial report in Journal of dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07577245 (Comparison of Robotic and Static Guide Assisted Surgery for Rehabilitation of Monolateral Distal Extension Edentulism With Implant-supported Fixed Partial Dentures), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Robotic and Static Guide Assisted Surgery for Rehabilitation of Monolateral Distal Extension Edentulism With Implant-supported Fixed Partial Dentures: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic Computer-Assisted Dental Implant Surgery Versus Free-Hand and Guided Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy, Efficiency, and Patient- and Surgeon-Reported Outcomes of Static Versus Robotic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Trial
- Autonomous robotic execution of nonlinear toolpaths for geometry-matched osteotomy in tooth autotransplantation: an in vitro study.International journal of oral science · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an AI-assisted, Dual-Template Workflow in Improving the Accuracy of Tooth Autotransplantation.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Robotic Guidance and Optical Navigation for Precision Implant Placement: a Prospective Comparative Clinical Study.Maedica · 2026Article
- A Dynamic Navigation-Assisted Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation in Severely Atrophic Maxillae: A Descriptive Case Series.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Dynamic navigation-assisted extraction of impacted maxillary anterior teeth: a model-based accuracy study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Digital Dentistry in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review of Current Capabilities and Future Directions.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Accuracy and lateral force analysis of an improved process for autonomous robotic system in mandibular all-on-4 implant surgery: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- An In Vitro Analysis of Implant Site Preparation and Placement Protocols on Implant Accuracy in Robot-Assisted Procedures.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Dynamic and Robotic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery-A Possible Workflow for the Future?Australian dental journal · 2025Review
- Robotic Surgical Systems in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- Real-Time Motion Compensation for Dynamic Dental Implant Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Beyond Accuracy: Clinical Outcomes of Computer Assisted Implant Surgery.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Review
- A Digital Clinical Records Versus Paper Records in Dental Practice: A Comparative Study.BioMed research international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise surgical positioning according to a digital plan is important for aesthetic and biologically stable dental implant restorations. This randomized controlled trial compared implant placement assisted by robotic surgery (RS), dynamic navigation (DN), or 3-dimensional printed static guide (SG). An overall 45 patients with a missing tooth in the premolar/molar region were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 groups. Implant positional accuracy (primary outcome), early wound healing, soft tissue microcirculation, patient-reported outcome measures, and surgeon preference were measured by calibrated blind examiners. One adverse event occurred in DN and RS. In RS (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.