ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2025
Parental Somatic Mosaicism Detected During Prenatal Diagnosis.
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global recommendations for the use of diagnostic genomic sequencing in the prenatal setting on behalf of the ESHG and ISPD.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Advances in the etiology of congenital scoliosis: from morphology to spatiotemporal molecular mechanisms (2015-2025).EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
- Inherited variants in autosomal dominant disease genes are a significant cause of fetal structural anomalies.Journal of medical genetics · 2026Article
- Case Report: First case of paternal mosaicism in Snijders Blok-Fisher syndrome.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Maternal Mosaicism Challenges in Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAccurate recurrence risks are essential for genomic counselling and parental reproductive choices. Historically, Sanger sequencing was used to test parental samples, which has a limited sensitivity of ∼ 10% for detecting somatic mosaicism. Next generation sequencing (NGS) methods, utilised for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) and trio prenatal exome sequencing in our laboratory, have greater sensitivity. Here we review the cases of parental somatic mosaicism we have detected and discuss its impact on management.
methodLaboratory databases from 1 January 2015 to 30 September 2022 were reviewed to identify all cases where parental somatic mosaicism was detected during NIPD and prenatal exome testing.
resultsDuring the development of NIPD testing, we identified 10/131 (7.6%) families with parental somatic mosaicism. In six cases where NGS detected levels between 0.37% and 8.82%, prior testing with Sanger sequencing had not detected mosaicism. In our exome sequencing cohort, we detected parental mosaicism in 4/101 (3.96%) cases. Clinical features of the condition were identified in 2/14 parents.
conclusionThe sensitivity of the testing technique needs to be considered when counselling parents on recurrence risk. Parents need to be aware that modern approaches to prenatal diagnosis may allow identification of mosaicism, which may have implications for their own health and change recurrence risks for future pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.