ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2025
45° helical plates are a valid alternative to straight plates for treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 45° helical plates are a valid alternative to straight plates for treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Helical plates used for proximal humeral shaft fracture fixation avoid the radial nerve distally as compared to straight plates. To investigate in a human cadaveric model the biomechanical competence of straight lateral plates versus 45° helical plates used for fixation of proximal comminuted humeral shaft fractures, eight pairs of human cadaveric humeri were instrumented using either a long straight PHILOS plate (Group 1) or a 45° helical plate (Group 2) for treatment of an unstable proximal humeral shaft fracture. All specimens were tested under non-destructive quasi-static loading in axial compression, internal and external rotation, and bending in four directions. Subsequently, progressively increasing cyclic loading in internal rotation was applied until failure and interfragmentary movements were monitored by motion tracking. Axial displacement (mm) was 3.13 ± 0.31 in Group 1 and 2.60 ± 0.42 in Group 2, p = 0.015. Flexion/extension deformation (°) in Group 1 and Group 2 was 0.56 ± 0.42 and 0.43 ± 0.23, p = 0.551. Varus/valgus deformation (°) was 6.39 ± 0.44 in Group 1 and 5.13 ± 0.87 in Group 2, p = 0.012. Shear (mm) and torsional (°) displacement were 5.36 ± 0.76 and 17.75 ± 1.06 in Group 1, and 5.03 ± 0.46 and 16.79 ± 1.36 in Group 2, p ≥ 0.090. Cycles to catastrophic failure were 10000 ± 1401 in Group 1 and 9082 ± 1933 in Group 2, p = 0.708. From a biomechanical perspective, 45° helical plating is associated with lower axial and varus/valgus displacement under axial loading and demonstrates comparable resistance to failure versus straight plating. Therefore, 45° helical plates can be considered as a valid alternative to straight plates for treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.