ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024
A Computable Phenotype Algorithm for Postvaccination Myocarditis/Pericarditis Detection Using Real-World Data: Validation Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- LLM and CQL computable phenotypes for myocarditis adverse event feature and outcome determinations using patient FHIR data: a feasibility study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy-related cardiovascular toxicity: from mechanisms to management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdverse events (AEs) associated with vaccination have traditionally been evaluated by epidemiological studies. More recently, they have gained attention due to the emergency use authorization of several COVID-19 vaccines. As part of its responsibility to conduct postmarket surveillance, the US Food and Drug Administration continues to monitor several AEs of interest to ensure the safety of vaccines, including those for COVID-19.
objectiveThis study is part of the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety Initiative, which aims to improve the US Food and Drug Administration's postmarket surveillance capabilities while minimizing the burden of collecting clinical data on suspected postvaccination AEs. The objective of this study was to enhance active surveillance efforts through a pilot platform that can receive automatically reported AE cases through a health care data exchange.
methodsWe detected cases by sharing and applying computable phenotype algorithms to real-world data in health care providers' electronic health records databases. Using the fast healthcare interoperability resources standard for secure data transmission, we implemented a computable phenotype algorithm on a new health care system. The study focused on the algorithm's positive predictive value, validated through clinical records, assessing both the time required for implementation and the accuracy of AE detection.
resultsThe algorithm required 200-250 hours to implement and optimize. Of the 6,574,420 clinical encounters across 694,151 patients, 30 cases were identified as potential myocarditis/pericarditis. Of these, 26 cases were retrievable, and 24 underwent clinical validation. In total, 14 cases were confirmed as definite or probable myocarditis/pericarditis, yielding a positive predictive value of 58.3% (95% CI 37.3%-76.9%). These findings underscore the algorithm's capability for real-time detection of AEs, though they also highlight variability in performance across different health care systems.
conclusionsThe study advocates for the ongoing refinement and application of distributed computable phenotype algorithms to enhance AE detection capabilities. These tools are crucial for comprehensive postmarket surveillance and improved vaccine safety monitoring. The outcomes suggest the need for further optimization to achieve more consistent results across diverse health care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.