Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39585925›Full record

ReviewPLoS biology2024

Reconstructing the last common ancestor of all eukaryotes.

Thomas A Richards, Laura Eme, John M Archibald, Guy Leonard, Susana M Coelho, Alex de Mendoza, Christophe Dessimoz, Pavel Dolezal, Lillian K Fritz-Laylin, Toni Gabaldón and 20 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reversal to osmotrophy in eukaryotes.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Energetics and evolution: Response to Martin.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Bioenergetics · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Axonemal dynein contributions to flagellar beat types and waveforms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Eukaryogenesis From FECA to LECA: Radical Steps Along the Way.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Planetary microbiology: microbes, planets, and the search for life.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. A diverse Palaeoproterozoic microbial ecosystem implies early eukaryogenesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Thomas A RichardsDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9692-0973
Laura EmeEcologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
John M ArchibaldDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Institute for Comparative Genomics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7255-780X
Guy LeonardDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Susana M CoelhoDepartment of Algal Development and Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Alex de MendozaSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United States of America.
Christophe DessimozDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pavel DolezalCharles University, Faculty of Science, Department of Parasitology, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
Lillian K Fritz-LaylinDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Toni GabaldónBarcelona Supercomputing Centre (BSC-CNS), Barcelona, Spain.
Vladimír HamplCharles University, Faculty of Science, Department of Parasitology, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
Geert J P L KopsHubrecht Institute-KNAW, Oncode Institute, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Michelle M LegerInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain.
Purificacion Lopez-GarciaEcologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
James O McInerneyDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
David MoreiraEcologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Sergio A Muñoz-GómezDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Daniel J RichterInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Barcelona, Spain.
Iñaki Ruiz-TrilloCatalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain.
Alyson E SantoroDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Arnau Sebé-PedrósInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Berend SnelTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Courtney W StairsDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Eelco C TromerCell Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jolien J E van HooffLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Bill WicksteadSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Tom A WilliamsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Andrew J RogerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Institute for Comparative Genomics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Joel B DacksDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Jeremy G WidemanCenter for Mechanisms of Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4426-9533

Funding

Chytrid fungi and the functional specification of actin networksR35GM143039 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FRITZ-LAYLIN, LILLIAN KATHLEEN · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM143039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the origin of eukaryotic cells is one of the most difficult problems in all of biology. A key challenge relevant to the question of eukaryogenesis is reconstructing the gene repertoire of the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA). As data sets grow, sketching an accurate genomics-informed picture of early eukaryotic cellular complexity requires provision of analytical resources and a commitment to data sharing. Here, we summarise progress towards understanding the biology of LECA and outline a community approach to inferring its wider gene repertoire. Once assembled, a robust LECA gene set will be a useful tool for evaluating alternative hypotheses about the origin of eukaryotes and understanding the evolution of traits in all descendant lineages, with relevance in diverse fields such as cell biology, microbial ecology, biotechnology, agriculture, and medicine. In this Consensus View, we put forth the status quo and an agreed path forward to reconstruct LECA's gene content.

Indexed as

EukaryotaPhylogenyBiological EvolutionEukaryotic CellsEvolution, MolecularGenomics

Identifiers

PMID39585925
PMCPMC11627563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.