Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39585892›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Deep learning-based image classification of sea turtles using object detection and instance segmentation models.

Jong-Won Baek, Jung-Il Kim, Chang-Bae Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jong-Won BaekDepartment of Biotechnology, Sangmyung University, Seoul, Korea.
Jung-Il KimDepartment of Biotechnology, Sangmyung University, Seoul, Korea.
Chang-Bae KimDepartment of Biotechnology, Sangmyung University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1040-7600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sea turtles exhibit high migratory rates and occupy a broad range of habitats, which in turn makes monitoring these taxa challenging. Applying deep learning (DL) models to vast image datasets collected from citizen science programs can offer promising solutions to overcome the challenge of monitoring the wide habitats of wildlife, particularly sea turtles. Among DL models, object detection models, such as the You Only Look Once (YOLO) series, have been extensively employed for wildlife classification. Despite their successful application in this domain, detecting objects in images with complex backgrounds, including underwater environments, remains a significant challenge. Recently, instance segmentation models have been developed to address this issue by providing more accurate classification of complex images compared to traditional object detection models. This study compared the performance of two state-of-the-art DL methods namely; the object detection model (YOLOv5) and instance segmentation model (YOLOv5-seg), to detect and classify sea turtles. The images were collected from iNaturalist and Google and then divided into 64% for training, 16% for validation, and 20% for test sets. Model performance during and after finishing training was evaluated by loss functions and various indexes, respectively. Based on loss functions, YOLOv5-seg demonstrated a lower error rate in detecting rather than classifying sea turtles than the YOLOv5. According to mean Average Precision (mAP) values, which reflect precision and recall, the YOLOv5-seg model showed superior performance than YOLOv5. The mAP0.5 and mAP0.5:0.95 for the YOLOv5 model were 0.885 and 0.795, respectively, whereas for the YOLOv5-seg, these values were 0.918 and 0.831, respectively. In particular, based on the loss functions and classification results, the YOLOv5-seg showed improved performance for detecting rather than classifying sea turtles compared to the YOLOv5. The results of this study may help improve sea turtle monitoring in the future.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTurtlesAnimalsEcosystem

Identifiers

PMID39585892
PMCPMC11588218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.