ArticlePloS one2024
Deep learning-based image classification of sea turtles using object detection and instance segmentation models.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperparameter optimization to enhance the performance of deep learning models for the early detection of invasive turtles in Korea.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- GAN-based underwater image enhancement and scene classification using transfer learning.PloS one · 2026Article
- A deep learning-based fusion framework for robust fine-grained classification of sea turtles in support of marine biodiversity.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sea turtles exhibit high migratory rates and occupy a broad range of habitats, which in turn makes monitoring these taxa challenging. Applying deep learning (DL) models to vast image datasets collected from citizen science programs can offer promising solutions to overcome the challenge of monitoring the wide habitats of wildlife, particularly sea turtles. Among DL models, object detection models, such as the You Only Look Once (YOLO) series, have been extensively employed for wildlife classification. Despite their successful application in this domain, detecting objects in images with complex backgrounds, including underwater environments, remains a significant challenge. Recently, instance segmentation models have been developed to address this issue by providing more accurate classification of complex images compared to traditional object detection models. This study compared the performance of two state-of-the-art DL methods namely; the object detection model (YOLOv5) and instance segmentation model (YOLOv5-seg), to detect and classify sea turtles. The images were collected from iNaturalist and Google and then divided into 64% for training, 16% for validation, and 20% for test sets. Model performance during and after finishing training was evaluated by loss functions and various indexes, respectively. Based on loss functions, YOLOv5-seg demonstrated a lower error rate in detecting rather than classifying sea turtles than the YOLOv5. According to mean Average Precision (mAP) values, which reflect precision and recall, the YOLOv5-seg model showed superior performance than YOLOv5. The mAP0.5 and mAP0.5:0.95 for the YOLOv5 model were 0.885 and 0.795, respectively, whereas for the YOLOv5-seg, these values were 0.918 and 0.831, respectively. In particular, based on the loss functions and classification results, the YOLOv5-seg showed improved performance for detecting rather than classifying sea turtles compared to the YOLOv5. The results of this study may help improve sea turtle monitoring in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.