ArticlePloS one2024
Nocturnal playback experiments: The response of two European species of birds to singing of foreign male at night.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that nocturnal singing in diurnal birds is a common phenomenon, however, the understanding of the mechanisms, functions and consequences of this behaviour has been lacking. We focused on the night singing of two diurnal songbirds-the yellowhammer and the common chaffinch that are widely distributed in Europe. We conducted day and night playback experiments, during which we broadcast songs of an unfamiliar male to the territory holder at two different stages of the breeding season, to examine whether the night singing in species which normally do not sing at night elicits responses from their conspecifics. We hypothesized that if nocturnal singing had no function, birds would ignore the night-time playback and respond only to the daytime intrusion. Otherwise, a response to the night-time playback would suggest that night singing may increase reproductive success but is limited by ecological factors. We found that, in contrast to the diurnal experiment, neither species responded vocally to the nocturnal playback. In yellowhammers, the probability of flights was higher during and after the playback than before it. This pattern was similar both during the day and night and did not differ between the stages of the season. For the common chaffinches, the probability of flight was low at night and constant across treatments, in contrast to the day when we observed more flights during the playback stage than before and after it. The playback of either species' songs at night caused the approach of predators, which was not observed during the day. The observed discrepancy in the probability of flights between the species suggests that nocturnal singing is a functional trait that affects other individuals in a specific context. Nocturnal singing does not seem to be a simple behaviour that extends during the day; it is a complex mechanism potentially dependent on specific conditions related to intraspecific communication, predatory pressure, local female access, or species' evolutionary history. We emphasise that those ecological and evolutionary factors need to be taken into account to understand this phenomenon widely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.