Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39585863›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2024

Systematic review and meta-analysis of recombinant herpes zoster vaccine in immunocompromised populations.

Fawziah Marra, Michael Yip, Jacquelyn J Cragg, Nirma Khatri Vadlamudi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Recombinant zoster vaccine and risk of kidney failure, cardiovascular, and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fawziah MarraFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1266-1901
Michael YipFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jacquelyn J CraggFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nirma Khatri VadlamudiDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5513-7926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceHerpes zoster infection is common in immunocompromised individuals. Recently, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended immunizing with the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV).

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of RZV in immunocompromised individuals, such as transplant recipients, cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, individuals with preexisting autoimmune diseases and HIV-infected patients. DATA SOURCES AND SELECTION: From January 1984 to October 2023, a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) evaluating RZV compared to placebo in immunocompromised adults were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: Study characteristics and estimates on the incidence of herpes zoster, immune responses, and safety data were extracted from studies. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Differences by study-level characteristics were estimated using subgroup meta-analysis and metaregression.

resultsSeven RCTs were included. Compared to placebo, RZV reduced the incidence of herpes zoster across all ages by 81% (RR: 0.19, 95%CI: 0.09, 0.44), with moderate heterogeneity across the studies (I2 = 60.49%; τ2 = 0.31; P = 0.07). RZV significantly increased humoral and cellular immunity one month after the last dose. Transplant and past malignancy were associated with lower immunogenicity. RZV was more reactogenic with more local and systemic adverse events. There was no difference in serious adverse events or death between the two arms.

conclusionThis study suggests that RZV reduces the risk of herpes zoster infection in immunocompromised individuals. This vaccine should be routinely offered to immunocompromised individuals, preferably before chemotherapy or treatment.

Indexed as

Herpes ZosterHerpes Zoster VaccineImmunocompromised HostHumansIncidenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVaccines, SyntheticHerpes Zoster VaccineVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID39585863
PMCPMC11588208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.