Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39585824›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Outlier detection of clustered functional data with image and signal processing applications by archetype analysis.

Aleix Alcacer, Irene Epifanio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleix AlcacerDepartment of Mathematics, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain.
Irene EpifanioDepartment of Mathematics, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6973-311X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we introduce an innovative methodology for anomaly detection of curves, applicable to both multivariate and multi-argument functions. This approach distinguishes itself from prior methods by its capability to identify outliers within clustered functional data sets. We achieve this by extending the recent AA + kNN technique, originally designed for multivariate analysis, to functional data contexts. Our method demonstrates superior performance through a comprehensive comparative analysis against twelve state-of-the-art techniques, encompassing simulated scenarios with either a single functional cluster or multiple clusters. Additionally, we substantiate the effectiveness of our approach through its application in three distinct computer vision tasks and a signal processing problem. To facilitate transparency and replication of our results, we provide access to both the code and the datasets used in this research.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisHumansMultivariate AnalysisSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID39585824
PMCPMC11588226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.