ArticleEndocrine connections2025
Gender-affirming hormone therapy: effects on cardiovascular risk and vascular function.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood donor safety and selection criteria for individuals self-identifying as trans or non-binary.Vox sanguinis · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular disease prevention in sexual minorities, A fellow's voice.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is used in individuals with gender identity dysphoria to align an individual's secondary sexual characteristics with their affirmed gender. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to explore the mechanisms regarding the effects of GAHT on the vasculature.
methodsA literature search using PUBMED, Embase, Scopus and Lilacs was performed using search terms for GAHT, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and transgender. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers. Comparison to a cohort of transgender individuals naïve or prior to GAHT or a cisgender population was required. Quality assessment was done using the relevant Critical Skills Appraisal Programme checklists.
resultsOut of 2,564 potentially eligible studies, 69 studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies provided evidence of beneficial changes in CVD risk profile including reduced haemoglobin and pro-inflammatory markers, and atheroprotective changes in lipids in transgender women. In transgender men there was evidence of negative changes in CVD risk profile including atherogenic changes in lipids and increased haemoglobin, arterial stiffness, and pro-inflammatory markers.
conclusionsThere is a paucity of research across non-traditional measures of CVD risk which in combination with heterogeneous study design, loss of follow-up, low sample sizes and lack of diversity in age and ethnicity requires the results to be interpreted with caution. More evidence is required to elucidate the mechanisms behind the increased risk of CVD in the transgender population and determine if GAHT is a contributing factor.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.