ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
TPepPro: a deep learning model for predicting peptide-protein interactions.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- PEARL: novel protein targets recommendation model via heterogeneous graph representation learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Resnet-Driven In Silico Identification of Lead Peptides from the Venom Gland Transcriptome ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GeoPep: A Geometry-Aware Masked Language Model for Protein-Peptide Binding Site Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Proteome-wide prediction of interactions between structured domains and peptide motifs reveals functionally coherent subnetworks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Peptide-protein docking: from physics-based models to generative intelligence.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- PepLM-GNN: A graph neural network framework leveraging pre-trained language models for peptide-protein binding prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Peptide-based drug design using generative AI.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Role of Peptides in Skeletal Muscle Wasting: A Scoping Review.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Article
- ProGraphTrans: multimodal dynamic collaborative framework for protein representation learning.BMC biology · 2025Article
- PCANN Program for Structure-Based Prediction of Protein-Protein Binding Affinity: Comparison With Other Neural-Network Predictors.Proteins · 2025Article
- Recent progress and future challenges in structure-based protein-protein interaction prediction.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- MSF-CPMP: A novel multi-source feature fusion model for prediction of cyclic peptide membrane permeability.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationPeptides and their derivatives hold potential as therapeutic agents. The rising interest in developing peptide drugs is evidenced by increasing approval rates by the FDA of USA. To identify the most potential peptides, study on peptide-protein interactions (PepPIs) presents a very important approach but poses considerable technical challenges. In experimental aspects, the transient nature of PepPIs and the high flexibility of peptides contribute to elevated costs and inefficiency. Traditional docking and molecular dynamics simulation methods require substantial computational resources, and the predictive accuracy of their results remain unsatisfactory.
resultsTo address this gap, we proposed TPepPro, a Transformer-based model for PepPI prediction. We trained TPepPro on a dataset of 19,187 pairs of peptide-protein complexes with both sequential and structural features. TPepPro utilizes a strategy that combines local protein sequence feature extraction with global protein structure feature extraction. Moreover, TPepPro optimizes the architecture of structural featuring neural network in BN-ReLU arrangement, which notably reduced the amount of computing resources required for PepPIs prediction. According to comparison analysis, the accuracy reached 0.855 in TPepPro, achieving an 8.1% improvement compared to the second-best model TAGPPI. TPepPro achieved an AUC of 0.922, surpassing the second-best model TAGPPI with 0.844. Moreover, the newly developed TPepPro identify certain PepPIs that can be validated according to previous experimental evidence, thus indicating the efficiency of TPepPro to detect high potential PepPIs that would be helpful for amino acid drug applications. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of TPepPro is available at https://github.com/wanglabhku/TPepPro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.