ArticleJournal of phycology2024
Subarctic sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima, Phaeophyceae) summer productivity and contribution to carbon budgets.
Article in Journal of phycology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Subarctic sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima, Phaeophyceae) summer productivity and contribution to carbon budgets.Journal of phycology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Kelp forests are known to be very productive ecosystems and constitute a central component of the marine carbon cycle in coastal areas. Nevertheless, crucial carbon-related data are missing to be able to include them properly in carbon budgets. A thorough understanding of the kelp contribution to the carbon cycle is especially important in regions prone to experiencing strong seasonal fluctuations in environmental conditions, such as subarctic regions. This study aimed to quantify primary productivity through growth rates and oxygen fluxes of a dominant kelp species in subarctic regions, Saccharina latissima, and to link oxygen fluxes to environmental parameters. Our results showed that strong primary productivity oxygen fluxes coincided with high light levels in July and most of August, while growth rates stayed similar all summer. An overall decline in all primary productivity proxies happened from late August, suggesting a seasonal slowing down of S. latissima metabolism. The estimated quantity of carbon stored in tissue during growth represented from 6% to 28% of the gross primary productivity. Further research is needed to explore how and how much carbon transits through living kelp tissue in different seasons, to better understand the contribution of subarctic kelp to coastal carbon budgets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.