Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39585696›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Daniel S Reuland, Meghan C O'Leary, Seth D Crockett, Deeonna E Farr, Renée M Ferrari, Teri L Malo, Alexis A Moore, Connor M Randolph, Shana Ratner, Lindsay R Stradtman and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04406714 (Scaling Colorectal Cancer Screening Through Outreach, Referral, and Engagement), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04406714 nacompletednot on this map

Scaling Colorectal Cancer Screening Through Outreach, Referral, and Engagement (SCORE): A State-Level Program to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Burden in Vulnerable Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2020 to 2024Enrolled4,318ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsTrial Mailed FIT Intervention - Age Group 50-75, Sub-Study Mailed FIT Intervention Enhanced Envelope - Age Group 45-49, Sub-Study Mailed FIT Active Comparator Plain Envelope - Age Group 45-49
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Effectiveness ofCancers · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Daniel S ReulandLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Meghan C O'LearyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Seth D CrockettDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Deeonna E FarrDepartment of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Renée M FerrariLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Teri L MaloPatient Support Pillar, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, Georgia.
Alexis A MooreLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Connor M RandolphLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Shana RatnerDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Lindsay R StradtmanLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Christina StylianouLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Kevin SuLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Xianming TanLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Van TangLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Stephanie B WheelerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Alison T BrennerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

Scaling Colorectal Cancer Screening Through Outreach, Referral, and Engagement (SCORE): A State-Level Program to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Burden in Vulnerable PopulationsUH3CA233251 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REULAND, DANIEL S. · 2019 to 2023
$4.4M
Scaling Colorectal Cancer Screening Through Outreach, Referral, and Engagement (SCORE): A State-Level Program to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Burden in Vulnerable PopulationsUG3CA233251 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REULAND, DANIEL S. · 2018 to 2018
$763k
NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA233251NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA233251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective but remains underused in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a centralized CRC screening outreach intervention involving mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach and patient navigation to colonoscopy after abnormal results of FIT. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial was conducted, using intention-to-treat analysis. Participants were enrolled from July 6, 2020, to September 17, 2021, and analyses were performed from July 6, 2023, to January 31, 2024. The study was conducted at independent FQHCs comprising 12 clinical delivery sites in North Carolina. The outreach intervention was centralized at an academic cancer center. Active individuals aged 50 to 75 years at average risk for CRC and not current with screening per US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations were included. Intervention: In addition to usual care, intervention participants received mailed screening outreach materials including an introductory letter, FIT kit packet with instructions and return postage, and 2 reminder letters if needed. Intervention participants with positive results of mailed FIT were offered navigation to facilitate follow-up colonoscopy completion. Control participants received usual care alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was completion of a US Preventive Services Task Force-recommended CRC screening test within 6 months determined by electronic health record review. Secondary outcomes were colonoscopy completion within 6 months after positive FIT results and detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia, defined as advanced adenoma or CRC. Results: A total of 4002 participants were included (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [6.8] years; 2256 [56.4%] female; 364 (9.1%) Hispanic; 1082 [27.0%] non-Hispanic Black; 2288 [57.2%] non-Hispanic White; 1198 [29.9%] commercially insured; 617 [15.4%] Medicaid; 1227 [30.7%] Medicare; and 960 [24.0%] uninsured), with 2001 randomized to each group. Compared with controls, intervention participants were more likely to complete screening within 6 months of randomization (30.0% vs 9.7%; difference, 20.29 percentage points; 95% CI, 17.85-22.73 percentage points). The intervention was effective in all insurance types. In the intervention arm, 33 of 48 participants with positive FIT results (68.8%) completed follow-up colonoscopy within 6 months compared with 8 of 18 participants (44.4%) in the control arm (difference, 24.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.13 to 50.74 percentage points). Advanced colorectal neoplasia was detected in 29 intervention participants (1.4%) and 15 control participants (0.7%) (difference, 0.68 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.05-1.35 percentage points). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of centralized screening outreach intervention in diverse patients served by independent FQHCs, CRC screening completion and advanced colorectal neoplasia detection were substantially increased. Future studies should examine the cost and scalability of this intervention in this context. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04406714.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerOccult BloodAgedFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaPatient NavigationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39585696
PMCPMC11589799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.