Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39585659›Full record

ArticleJAMA pediatrics2025

The Philadelphia Beverage Tax and Pediatric Weight Outcomes.

Emily F Gregory, Christina A Roberto, Nandita Mitra, Emma K Edmondson, Joshua Petimar, Jason P Block, Gary Hettinger, Laura A Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily F GregoryChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Christina A RobertoDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Nandita MitraDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Emma K EdmondsonChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Joshua PetimarDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jason P BlockDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gary HettingerDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Laura A GibsonDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

Evaluating the influence of a beverage tax on health outcomesR01DK123624 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GIBSON, LAURA, ROBERTO, CHRISTINA ANN · 2020 to 2022
$1.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK123624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Taxation of sweetened beverages is a proposed strategy to reduce excess sugar consumption. The association of such taxes with health outcomes is not well studied. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is the largest US city with a beverage tax. Objective: To assess whether the 2017 Philadelphia beverage tax was associated with changes in pediatric weight outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study used difference-in-differences models weighted by inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for differences between youth in Philadelphia (tax exposed) and in the surrounding counties (control) on age, sex, race, ethnicity, Medicaid insurance status, health care use, and census-tract socioeconomic index. Mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models estimated differences in posttax changes in standardized body mass index (zBMI) and prevalence of obesity (a BMI 95th percentile or higher for age and sex) between Philadelphia and control. Stratified analyses assessed differences by age, sex, race, Medicaid insurance status, and baseline weight. Data came from electronic health records of a primary care network operating in the Philadelphia region. A panel analysis included youth 2 to 18 years old with 1 or more BMI measurement pretax (2014 to 2016) and 1 or more BMI measurement posttax (2018 to 2019). A cross-sectional analysis included youth 2 to 18 years old with 1 or more BMI measurement at any time from 2014 to 2019. These data were analyzed from December 2020 through July 2024. Exposure: Living in Philadelphia after implementation of the beverage tax. Main outcomes and measures: zBMI and obesity prevalence. Results: In panel analysis of 136 078 youth, the tax was associated with a difference in zBMI change of -0.004 (95% CI, -0.009 to 0.001) between Philadelphia and the control and a 1.02 odds ratio (95% CI, 0.97-1.08) of BMIs in the 95th percentile or higher. In cross-sectional analysis of 258 584 youth, the difference in zBMI change was -0.004 (95% CI, -0.009 to 0.001) and the odds ratio of a BMI in the 95th percentile or higher was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.95-1.07). In subgroup analyses, some differences in zBMI change were evident by race, age, Medicaid insurance status, and baseline weight but these differences were small and inconsistent across samples. Conclusions and Relevance: These results show that 2 years after implementation, the Philadelphia beverage tax was not associated with changes in youth zBMI or obesity prevalence. Though certain subgroups demonstrated small statistically significant changes in zBMI, they are of low clinical significance.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexPediatric ObesityTaxesAdolescentBeveragesBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePhiladelphiaSugar-Sweetened Beverages

Identifiers

PMID39585659
PMCPMC11589857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.