Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39585626›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Evaluation of Marburg Virus Medical Countermeasures in Guinea Pigs.

Christopher Massey, Robert W Cross, Courtney Woolsey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher MasseyInstitutional Office of Regulated Nonclinical Studies, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Robert W CrossGalveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Courtney WoolseyGalveston National Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. cbwillia@utmb.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various animal models have been established to gain a better understanding of the pathogenesis of Marburg virus (MARV) and Ravn virus (RAVV), and to develop medical countermeasures (MCMs) against them. Of these models, which range from rodents to nonhuman primates (NHPs), the macaque model most closely mimics the severe disease displayed in humans. Nevertheless, rodent models mirror many key aspects of human infection and are frequently used for the initial assessment of experimental vaccines and treatments. Due to the less restrictive housing and husbandry requirements for these models, large-scale experiments can be performed to evaluate a number of test articles and/or dosing regimens.Adaptation of MARV and RAVV by serial passaging is necessary to cause disease in immunocompetent rodent species. While mice provide limited predictive value of vaccine and therapeutic efficacy against these viruses, guinea pigs have emerged as a dependable indicator of outcomes in late-stage NHP testing. Additionally, the larger size of guinea pigs compared to mice permits more frequent and substantial blood sample collection. This chapter outlines the essential procedures to conduct intraperitoneal challenge, blood collection, and the administration of MCMs in MARV and RAVV guinea pig models using biosafety level 4 practices.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMarburgvirusMarburg Virus DiseaseAnimalsFemaleGuinea PigsHumansMedical CountermeasuresMiceAnimal modelsCavia porcellusMARVMCMRavn virusRAVVRodentsTherapeuticsVaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.