ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2024
Experimental Study of Products Based on Biocompatible Polymer Material from Methacrylic Oligomers as a Potential Barrier for Preventing Adhesions in Cardiac Surgery.
Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness and safety of two types of samples based on a biocompatible polymer material made of methacrylic oligomers (Reperen) as a potential antiadhesion pericardial barrier were evaluated in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Two kinds of samples, reinforced with a polyamide mesh and without reinforcement, were used. In in vitro experiments, no adhesion and aggregation of human fibroblasts to the test samples were detected. In in vivo experiments, the samples implanted to rats into the thigh muscles were easily separated from the surrounding tissues 1, 2, and 3 weeks after implantation, being weakly fixed only in the area of the edges. Histological examination at week 2 after implantation revealed no differences between the experimental and control groups. At week 1 and 3, fibrosis and inflammation were more pronounced in animals of the control group (with simulated implantation). The properties demonstrated by both samples of Reperen barriers (with and without polyamide mesh reinforcement) in vivo and in vitro allow considering them as a potential antiadhesion pericardial barrier for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39585594What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.