ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2025
Characterization, Optimization, and Scaling-up of Submerged Inonotus hispidus Mycelial Fermentation for Enhanced Biomass and Polysaccharide Production.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inonotus hispidus Polysaccharides Prepared by Graded Ethanol Precipitation Modulate the Gut-Immune Axis in Cyclophosphamide-Induced Immunosuppressed Mice.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- Screening and Quality Evaluation of Submerged Culture Media Formulations forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was to establish an efficient strategy based on inoculum-morphology control for the submerged mycelial fermentation of an edible and medicinal fungus, Inonotus hispidus. Two major morphological forms of the mycelial inoculum were compared, dispersed mycelial fragments versus aggregated mycelial clumps. The dispersed one was more favorable for the fermentation, starting with a shorter lag period and attaining a higher biomass yield and more uniform mycelium pellets in shake flasks. The mycelial pellets taken from the shake flask culture on day 6 were fragmented at 26,000 rpm in a homogenizer, and a shear time of 3 min provided the optimal inoculum. The inoculum and culture conditions were further verified in 5-L stirred tank fermenters and then the fermentation was scaled-up in a 100-L stirred tank. With the optimized inoculum and process conditions plus a fed-batch operation, much higher productivities, including 22.23 g/L biomass, 3.31 g/L EPS, and 5.21 g/L IPS, were achieved in the 100-L fermenter than in the flask culture. A composition analysis showed that the I. hispidus mycelium produced by the fermentation was rich in protein, dietary fiber, and polysaccharides which may be beneficial to health. Overall, the results have shown that the inoculum characteristics including age, morphology, and state of aggregation have significant impact on the productivity of mycelial biomass and polysaccharides in a submerged mycelial fermentation of the I. hispidus fungus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39585555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.