ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2025
Risk factors for septic shock in older patients with urinary tract infection.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundsFew studies have addressed the risk factors for the development of septic shock in older patients with urinary tract infections. We decided to investigate whether a similar risk exists in in older patients.
methodsA total of 1478 older patients (492 men, 986 women) aged 65 years or older (mean age 85.1 years) who were hospitalized and treated for urinary tract infections were included in this study, and factors contributing to the development of septic shock in these patients, including in terms of the causative pathogens and treatments employed, were investigated through a retrospective review of the patients' medical charts.
resultsUnderlying urinary tract infection with urolithiasis was found as the most significant risk factor for the development of septic shock (p < 0.01). Patients with urolithiasis were more frail, had higher urinary pH and calcium levels, and showed a higher frequency of infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant and rare bacteria. Cluster analysis revealed a higher incidence of death, septic shock, urolithiasis, and frailty in the patient group treated with carbapenem and/or MRSA agents.
conclusionSeptic shock was associated with a high risk of death in older patients with urinary tract infections, and urolithiasis was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of septic shock. Urolithiasis was also associated with frailty, suggesting that prevention of frailty may indirectly improve the prognosis of patients with septic shock secondary to urinary tract infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39585538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.