ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
CFD investigations of a shape-memory polymer foam-based endovascular embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Haemodynamic and biomechanical biomarker analysis of carotid fibromuscular dysplasia via fluid-structure interaction.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- In-Vitro Evaluations of Shape Memory Polymer Scaffolds With Tunable Architecture for the Endovascular Embolization of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
- Towards the Intravascular Delivery of 3D-printed Leached SMP for Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The hemodynamic and convective heat transfer effects of a patient-specific endovascular therapeutic agent based on shape-memory polymer foam (SMPf) are evaluated using computational fluid dynamics studies for six patient-specific aneurysm geometries. The SMPf device is modeled as a continuous porous medium with full expansion for the flow studies and with various degrees of expansion for the heat transfer studies. The flow simulation parameters were qualitatively validated based on the existing literature. Further, a mesh independence study was conducted to verify an optimal cell size and reduce the computational costs. For convective heat transfer, a worst-case scenario is evaluated where the minimum volumetric flow rate is applied alongside the zero-flux boundary conditions. In the flow simulations, we found a reduction of the average intra-aneurysmal flow of > 85% and a reduction of the maximum intra-aneurysmal flow of > 45% for all presented geometries. These findings were compared with the literature on numerical simulations of hemodynamic and heat transfer of SMPf devices. The results obtained from this study provide a novel and practical framework for optimizing the design of patient-specific SMPf devices, integrating advanced computational models of hemodynamics and heat transfer. This framework could guide the future development of personalized endovascular embolization solutions for intracranial aneurysms with improved therapeutic outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.