ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
The role of multimodal imaging in the diagnosis of prosthetic valve and intracardiac device endocarditis: A review.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of Cardiac Computed Tomography for Aortic Valve Infective Endocarditis: Coronary Arteries Evaluation and Concordance with Transoesophageal Findings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing Surgical Decision-Making for Infected Cardiac Device Lead Removal With 18F-FDG PET/CT: A Case Study and Literature Analysis.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Role of Multimodal Imaging in Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis: A Case Series.Infectious disease reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe cardiac condition associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, the modified Duke's criteria have been used to establish the diagnosis of IE, which includes using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. While echocardiography performs well in diagnosing native valve endocarditis, its diagnostic accuracy decreases in patients with prosthetic valves or implanted cardiac devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators. Given these limitations and advancements in cardiac imaging, including multimodal computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, there has been growing interest in the utility of these techniques for diagnosing prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection (CIEDI). Although numerous studies have investigated the value of these imaging modalities, their findings have been inconsistent. This article aims to reevaluate the role of advanced imaging in diagnosing PVE and CIEDI and its impact on managing prosthetic valves and device-related infective endocarditis. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Embase, and other relevant databases. Key terms such as 'infective endocarditis,' 'multimodal imaging,' 'prosthetic valve endocarditis,' '18F-FDG PET,' 'cardiac MRI,' and 'cardiac CT' were used to identify studies that investigated the role of these imaging modalities in diagnosing PVE and CIEDI. Publications with full text including randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, case reports, case series, reviews of literature, and society guidelines were included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39585526What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.