Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
Differences in efficacy of biweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin versus irinotecan alone in second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer with or without prior gastrectomy.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin combination therapy (BIRIP) and irinotecan monotherapy (IRI) are both expectable second-line chemotherapy (SLC) options for treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Although many patients receiving SLC have undergone gastrectomy, the impact of gastrectomy on SLC remains unclear, and the impact of gastrectomy may vary from regimen to regimen. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 290 eligible patients registered in two randomized phase III trials evaluating BIRIP (IRI, 60 mg/m
resultsThe BIRIP demonstrated significantly longer OS (11.1 vs. 6.8 months; HR 0.64; P = 0.026) and PFS (3.7 vs. 2.3 months; HR 0.54; P = 0.003) than the IRI, as well as better ORR (23.5% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.046) and DCR (74.5% vs. 47.6%, P = 0.010) in NGG. Although in PGG, the BIRIP failed to demonstrate differences in OS (13.8 vs. 13.8 months; HR 0.94; P = 0.722), PFS (4.9 vs. 4.5 months; HR 0.82; P = 0.194), ORR (18.3% vs. 20.5%) and DCR (70.4% vs. 65.1%). The incidence of grade 3 or worse adverse events did not differ except for a high incidence of anemia in the BIRIP group in PGG.
conclusionsBIRIP was an effective treatment option that may improve survival outcomes among patients with AGC without previous gastrectomy. CLINICAL
trial registrationUMIN000025367.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39585516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.