ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024
Surgeons' perspective on the use of carbon fibre plates for extremity fracture fixation.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction/purposeCarbon fibre plating (CFR-PEEK) became available to orthopaedic surgeons in 1998 as a competitor to the traditional metal implants. Despite this, the use of such implants has been limited globally. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the barriers to more widespread use of CFR-PEEK, specifically by examining orthopaedic surgeons' perceptions and opinions of its use through a cross-sectional survey.
methodsAn online questionnaire with basic information attached regarding similarities and differences between CFR-PEEK and metal implants was sent out internationally, with 106 responses gained from 26 countries. Specific questions were asked to ascertain orthopaedic surgeons' current knowledge of advantages and disadvantages of CFR-PEEK, the barriers they perceive to its more widespread use, and own personal preferences. Free-text responses were analysed and the results discussed.
resultsA minority of orthopaedic surgeons surveyed would choose CFR-PEEK over traditional metal implants (10.38%). The most common disadvantage of CFR-PEEK reported was increased cost, with 46.23% respondents identifying this. Concerns regarding structural integrity of the implant were second most commonly perceived disadvantage, with 34% of surgeons citing one or more of 'stiffness/breakage/durability/contourability' as a disadvantage. A small number of surgeons (3.8%) listed unfamiliarity as a potential disadvantage to the use of carbon fibre plates. The main barrier identified to their use was poor knowledge (education) in relation to the properties and existing evidence of their performance.
conclusionsMore work is needed to make CFR-PEEK more acceptable to surgeons including examination of perceived increased cost and increasing education of these implants. Further high-level evidence confirming carbon fibre non-inferiority may increase the usage of CFR-PEEK for extremity fracture fixation in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.