ArticlePediatric surgery international2024
Innovative minimally invasive gastric pull-up techniques in children: SILS and robot-assisted gastric pull-up.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aims to explore the rationality, feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of single-incision laparoscopic gastric pull-up (SILS-GPU) and robot-assisted gastric pull-up (R-GPU) methods.
methodsHospital records of patients who underwent gastric pull-up with either SILS-GPU or R-GPU between May2016 and January 2024 were reviewed. Demographics, diagnosis, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.
resultsOut of the total 12 patients (eight persistent corrosive esophageal stricture-PCES, four long gap esophageal atresia-LGEA), seven underwent SILS-GPU, while the remaining five underwent R-GPU. The choice of conduit route was based on the primary pathology (PCES/EA) and the presence of posterior mediastinal fibrosis and/or tracheomalacia. The posterior mediastinum was preferred in seven, intrathoracic in three, and retrosternal in two patients. Transhiatal esophagectomy was performed in seven patients, while transthoracic esophagectomy was performed in three. There were no instances of mortality or intraoperative complications related to the preferred technique. All patients except one with Down syndrome were able to feed orally.
conclusionSILS-GPU and R-GPU are demonstrated to be safe and effective in the pediatric population, with relatively lower complication rates in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39585432What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.