ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024
Femoral shaft fracture with a third fragment treated with an intramedullary nail: Is the displacement of the third fragment predictive of nonunion?
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Area-to-Length Ratio: a significant predictor of nonunion following intramedullary nailing of comminuted femoral shaft fractures.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Intramedullary Nailing in Femoral Diaphyseal Fractures: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFemoral shaft fractures with third fragments are difficult to reduce anatomically, affecting bone healing chances. The goal of this study is to determine the impact of the third fragment's radiological characteristics assessed on post-operative radiographs, as well as other factors, on the healing of type 32B femur shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nail.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 93 patients treated for femoral shaft fractures type 32 B. On post-operative X-rays, two radiologic parameters were evaluated: the third fragment size and the mean third fragment displacement. Patients had radiologic follow-up at 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12-months and were separated into 3 groups based on their fracture healing time: within 6 months (group 1), between 6 and 12 months (group 2), or nonunion after 12 months (group 3).
resultsAmong the 93 patients, 72 (77.4%) showed fracture healing at 6 months, 13 (14%) at 12 months, and 8 (8.6%) demonstrated nonunion at 12 months. The mean third fragment displacement was notably different between groups (p < 0.001) and was considerably greater in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2. The influence of third fragment displacement on outcomes under 6 months was determined by ROC analysis, using a cut-off value of 14 mm. Displacement under 14 mm predicted healing within 6 months with a sensitivity of 90.3% and a specificity of 61.9%. The statistical analysis demonstrated that the odds of experiencing non-union or delayed healing were approximately 15 times higher for patients with a third fragment displacement of 14 mm or greater.
conclusionThe third fragment displacement is the most important factor influencing healing within twelve months in femur shaft fractures type 32B managed with an intramedullary nail. Inversely, the third fragment size had no effect on the healing of the fractures in our series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39585425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.