Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39585425›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024

Femoral shaft fracture with a third fragment treated with an intramedullary nail: Is the displacement of the third fragment predictive of nonunion?

Jean G Louka, David Seligson, Khushdeep S Vig, Rodolfo Zamora, Jiyao Zou, Jon B Carlson, Miguel Daccarett

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jean G LoukaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. jeanloukas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0741-544X
David SeligsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Khushdeep S VigDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Rodolfo ZamoraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Jiyao ZouDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Jon B CarlsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Miguel DaccarettDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFemoral shaft fractures with third fragments are difficult to reduce anatomically, affecting bone healing chances. The goal of this study is to determine the impact of the third fragment's radiological characteristics assessed on post-operative radiographs, as well as other factors, on the healing of type 32B femur shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nail.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 93 patients treated for femoral shaft fractures type 32 B. On post-operative X-rays, two radiologic parameters were evaluated: the third fragment size and the mean third fragment displacement. Patients had radiologic follow-up at 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12-months and were separated into 3 groups based on their fracture healing time: within 6 months (group 1), between 6 and 12 months (group 2), or nonunion after 12 months (group 3).

resultsAmong the 93 patients, 72 (77.4%) showed fracture healing at 6 months, 13 (14%) at 12 months, and 8 (8.6%) demonstrated nonunion at 12 months. The mean third fragment displacement was notably different between groups (p < 0.001) and was considerably greater in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2. The influence of third fragment displacement on outcomes under 6 months was determined by ROC analysis, using a cut-off value of 14 mm. Displacement under 14 mm predicted healing within 6 months with a sensitivity of 90.3% and a specificity of 61.9%. The statistical analysis demonstrated that the odds of experiencing non-union or delayed healing were approximately 15 times higher for patients with a third fragment displacement of 14 mm or greater.

conclusionThe third fragment displacement is the most important factor influencing healing within twelve months in femur shaft fractures type 32B managed with an intramedullary nail. Inversely, the third fragment size had no effect on the healing of the fractures in our series.

Indexed as

Bone NailsFemoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFracture HealingFractures, UnunitedRadiographyAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultButterfly fragmentFemoral shaftIntramedullary NailNonunionThird Fragment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.