ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
Dosimetric evaluation of different cylinder diameters in three-dimensional vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative dosimetric study of single- vs. multi-channel cylindrical applicators in vaginal brachytherapy: Implications for organs at risk and vaginal surface doses.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the dosimetric, radiobiological, and toxicity differences between different cylinder diameters (d) in high-dose-rate three-dimensional computed-tomography-guided vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) for early-stage endometrial cancer (EC).
methodsFrom January 2019 to January 2024, postoperative EC patients treated with exclusive VBT using cylinders were classified by the cylinder diameter (d ≤ 2.6 cm: small-size; d ≥ 3.0 cm: large-size) and matched according to 1:2 propensity score matching. Vaginal clinical target volume (CTV) was a 3-mm expansion around the cylinder surface. Dosimetric parameters in equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) (α/β = 3 Gy) and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) of vaginal_CTV and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated. Urinary, gastrointestinal, and vaginal toxicities were assessed using CTCAE v5.0.
resultsAfter matching, 132 patients (small-size: 44; large-size: 88) were analyzed. For vaginal_CTV, the small-size group had higher doses to 2%, 5%, 0.1 cc, 1 cc, and 2 cc of the volume (D
conclusionCylinders with smaller diameters produced more nonuniform dose distributions in the target and delivered lower doses to bladder and rectum than large-size cylinders. However, the dosimetric differences did not translate into significant differences of radiobiological parameters or outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.