Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39585393›Full record

ReviewHNO2025

[Patient-reported outcome measures-use in diagnosing depression, anxiety, and stress].

Petra Brüggemann, Benjamin Böcking, Kurt Steinmetzger, Eva Winter, Felix Fischer, Matthias Rose, Birgit Mazurek

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Petra BrüggemannTinnituszentrum der Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. petra.brueggemann@charite.de.
Benjamin BöckingTinnituszentrum der Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
Kurt SteinmetzgerTinnituszentrum der Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
Eva WinterMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Psychosomatik, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Deutschland.
Felix FischerMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Psychosomatik, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Deutschland.
Matthias RoseMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Psychosomatik, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Deutschland.
Birgit MazurekTinnituszentrum der Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. birgit.mazurek@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is an umbrella term for various self-report instruments used to assess subjective health-related impressions and treatment success from the patient's perspective. In psychosomatic medicine, PROMs are often used to record subjective symptoms, psychosocial distress, and changes in health status, particularly in patients with comorbid (affective) disorders and frequent contact with physicians, but also in preventive health care and to monitor the effectiveness of treatment. In otolaryngology (ENT), self-report questionnaires (PROMs) are used, among other things, to assess the impact of hearing, speech, swallowing, and breathing disorders on patients' quality of life. Such scientifically validated tools make it possible to better understand the needs and priorities of patients and to integrate them into clinician-patient communication and treatment to promote individual, patient-centered care. Three dimensions for the assessment of subjective health-related experiences (depression, anxiety, stress) with corresponding instruments for the German-speaking area for use in clinical and research settings are presented in more detail, specifically for otolaryngology.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresStress, PsychologicalGermanyHumansReproducibility of ResultsAnxietyDepressionQuestionnairesStressTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID39585393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.