ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging and 18- FDG PET/CT in response assessment in rectosigmoid carcinoma.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical utility and future directions of FDG-PET in rectal cancer management.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the performance of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging (IVIM- DKI) in response assessment of rectosigmoid carcinoma to chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) and compare with 18-FDG PET/CT parameters.
methodsA total of 30 patients of recto-sigmoid cancer on CRT underwent baseline staging and follow-up with IVIM - DKI. Out of this cohort, 20 patients underwent 18-FDG PET/CT. IVIM- DKI MRI and PET/CT parameters were noted from both pre and post-chemoradiotherapy (done at 6 weeks after completion) scans. Quantitative IVIM-DKI parameters, viz. apparent (ADC) and molecular (D) diffusion coefficient, perfusion coefficient (f), and kurtosis (K) were measured from non-necrotic areas and semi-quantitative PET parameters including SUV max, SUV ratio, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were also measured. All these parameters correlated with the patient's response keeping RECIST 1.1 criteria as reference standard.
resultsA statistically significant increase in D and ADC with a significant decline in K was noted after therapy in the entire cohort. These changes were observed in both responders as well as non-responders. No significant differences were observed in the percentage changes of these parameters post therapy amongst both groups. Among 20 patients with follow-up PET/CT imaging, a significant decline in all parameters of primary lesion was seen post-therapy. Responders (n = 12) showed a significant decline in MTV and TLG from baseline after therapy, whereas non-responders did not show any such decline. Change in TLG (ɗ TLG), followed by ɗ MTV had the strongest correlation with a positive response. A ɗ TLG value of ≥ 54.19 carried a 79% sensitivity and 83% specificity in differentiating responders from non responders.
conclusion18-FDG PET/CT is a more accurate single modality for assessing both response and tumor burden post therapy, while ADC and D from IVIM MRI are useful adjuncts to response assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39585380What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.