ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2025
Null method to estimate the maximal PA at subsaturating concentrations of agonist.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of ivermectin on the activation and desensitization of the human GABAMolecular pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The maximal probability of being in an active state (PA,max) is a measure of gating efficacy for a given agonist acting on a given receptor channel. In macroscopic electrophysiological recordings, PA,max is typically estimated by comparing the amplitude of the current response to a saturating concentration of a test agonist to that of a reference agonist with known PA. Here, we describe an approach to estimate the PA,max for low-efficacy agonists at subsaturating concentrations. In this approach, the amplitude of the response to a high-efficacy control agonist applied alone is compared with the amplitude of the response to a control agonist coapplied with the low-efficacy test agonist that binds to the same site(s). If the response to the combination is larger than the response to the control agonist alone, then the PA,max of the test agonist is greater than the PA of the control response. Conversely, if the response to the control agonist is reduced upon exposure to the test agonist, then the PA,max of the test agonist is smaller than the PA of the control response. The exact PA,max of the test agonist can be determined by testing its effect at different concentrations of the control agonist to estimate the PA at which the effect changes direction. The main advantage of this approach lies in the ability to use low, subsaturating concentrations of the test agonist. The model-based predictions are supported by observations from activation of heteromeric and homomeric GABAA receptors by combinations of high- and low-efficacy orthosteric agonists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.