ArticleNeurology international2024
Risk of Stroke or Heart Attack in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Subjective Cognitive Impairment.
Article in Neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential Improvement in Memory and Executive Functions: Personalized Exercise versus Acupuncture for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Stroke-prone Individuals.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Multifactorial stratified analysis of two novel metabolism-related indices for predicting stroke in mild cognitive impairment.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe study aimed to identify Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) as an alert clinical manifestation of increased probability of major acute vascular events (MVEs), such as Ischemic Stroke and heart attack.
methodsIn a longitudinal study, 181 (M = 81, F = 100; mean age of 75.8 ± 8.69 years) patients were enrolled and divided into three groups based on diagnosis: Subjective Cognitive Impairment (SCI), amnestic MCI Single Domain (aMCI-SD), and amnestic MCI More Domain (aMCI-MD). Clinical assessment and the presence of vascular risk factors were collected.
resultsThe distribution of MVEs showed a higher incidence in the first two years of follow-up of 7.4% in SCI, 12.17% in aMCI-SD, and 8.57% in aMCI-MD. Acute Myocardial Infarction showed a major incidence in one year of follow-up (41%) and in two years of follow-up (29%). Also, Ischemic Stroke showed a major incidence in one year of follow-up (30%) and in two years of follow-up (40%). A statistically significant difference in the progression to dementia was shown (SCI 3.75%; aMCI-SD 10.43%; aMCI-MD 37%;
conclusionsMCI is considered an expression of the systemic activation of mechanisms of endothelial damage, representing a diagnosis predictive of increased risk of MVEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.