Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39585066›Full record

ReviewNeurology international2024

Survival After Shunt Therapy in Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Meta-Analysis of 1614 Patients.

Johannes Wach, Agi Güresir, Erdem Güresir, Martin Vychopen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johannes WachDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4680-0412
Agi GüresirDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Erdem GüresirDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Martin VychopenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt therapy is a crucial intervention for normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). This meta-analysis delves into survival time and the impact of baseline symptom burden on survival after VP shunt therapy for NPH, employing reconstructed pooled survival curves and a one-stage meta-analysis.

methodsIPD regarding overall survival (OS) were acquired from published Kaplan-Meier charts, utilizing the R package IPDfromKM in R (Version 4.3.1, the R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier charts were then generated from the pooled IPD data. Both one-stage and two-stage meta-analyses were executed, with hazard ratios (HRs) employed as metrics to evaluate effectiveness.

resultsFrom the initial screening of 216 records, five articles encompassing 1614 patients met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. In two of the five included studies, overall survival was stratified by gait score (1-4 vs. ≥4) in 1043 patients, continence score (1-3 vs. ≥4) in 1022 patients, and mRS (0-2 vs. ≥3) in 956 patients. Patients with good gait demonstrated a mean survival of 8.24 years, while those with poor gait had a mean survival of 6.19 years (log-rank test:

conclusionsThis comprehensive meta-analysis underscores the influence of baseline symptom burden on survival after VP shunt therapy in NPH. Therapy in the early stages for those without significant comorbidities may enhance survival.

Indexed as

baseline symptom burdenmeta-analysisnormal-pressure hydrocephalussurvival analysisventriculoperitoneal shunt therapy

Identifiers

PMID39585066
PMCPMC11587452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.