ArticleGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Functional Capacity of the Upper Airway in Older Adults with Chronic Stroke.
Article in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk factors and quality of life in adults with dysphagia after posterior skull base surgery: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Older adults with chronic stroke may experience compromised upper airway functions due to stroke-related changes and aging. This study aimed to evaluate the functional capacity of the upper airway in older adults with chronic stroke. (2) Methods: A total of 44 patients (22 in each group) were included in the study. The respiratory assessment involved measuring forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second, maximum voluntary ventilation, and peak cough flow. The voice assessment recorded intensity, frequency, shimmer, and the harmonics-to-noise ratio during a monologue task. Additionally, the maximum phonation time of /a/ and /s/ was recorded. The swallowing assessment included the Eating Assessment Tool-10 and the Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire. (3) Results: Significant differences were found in the experimental group compared to the control group in maximum voluntary ventilation (44.59 ± 15.61 vs. 58.50 ± 28.08,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.