Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39584914›Full record

SynthesisMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Beta-Blocker Use in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Doménica Herrera Hernández, Bárbara Abreu, Tania Siu Xiao, Andreina Rojas, Kevin López Romero, Valentina Contreras, Sol Villa Nogueyra, Zulma Sosa, Samantha M Alvarez, Camila Sánchez Cruz and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Doménica Herrera HernándezFacultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito 170525, Ecuador.
Bárbara AbreuFacultad de Medicina, Universidad de Carabobo, Valencia 2005, Venezuela.
Tania Siu XiaoRadiology Department, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3867-3601
Andreina RojasFacultad de Medicina, Universidad de Oriente, Núcleo Anzoátegui, Barcelona 6001, Venezuela.
Kevin López RomeroFacultad de Medicina, Universidad del Salvador, San Salvador 1101, El Salvador.
Valentina ContrerasDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Sol Villa NogueyraFacultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1053ABK, Argentina.ORCID 0009-0005-7944-6834
Zulma SosaFacultad de medicina, Universidad Evangélica de El Salvador, San Salvador 1101, El Salvador.
Samantha M AlvarezFaculty of Medicine, Saint George's University, True Blue FZ818, Grenada.ORCID 0009-0006-4354-1706
Camila Sánchez CruzFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.
Ernesto Calderón MartinezFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2237-9536

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of beta-blockers in the perioperative period has been widely investigated due to their potential to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and mortality; yet their overall impact on various postoperative outcomes remains debated. This study constitutes a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of beta-blockers on mortality, MI, stroke, and other adverse effects such as hypotension and bradycardia in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

methodsA comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases; we included randomized controlled trials and cohort and case-control studies published from 1999 to 2024.

resultsThis meta-analysis included data from 28 studies encompassing 1,342,430 patients. Perioperative beta-blockers were associated with a significant increase in stroke risk (RR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.97,

conclusionsPerioperative beta-blockers show increasing rates of stroke events following non-cardiac surgery but do not significantly impact the incidence of MI or mortality. The increased risks of hypotension and bradycardia necessitate careful patient selection and monitoring. Future research should aim to refine patient selection criteria and optimize perioperative management to balance the benefits and risks of beta-blocker use in surgical settings.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsPostoperative ComplicationsBradycardiaHumansHypotensionMyocardial InfarctionStrokeSurgical Procedures, OperativeAdrenergic beta-Antagonistsbradycardiacardiovascular outcomeshypotensionmortalitymyocardial infarctionnon-cardiac surgeryperioperative beta-blockersstroke

Identifiers

PMID39584914
PMCPMC11587062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.