ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
BioDSNN: a dual-stream neural network with hybrid biological knowledge integration for multi-gene perturbation response prediction.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A graph-based learning approach to predict the effects of gene perturbations on molecular phenotypes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Deciphering hierarchical regulatory network of cell fate via an epigenetics-informed heterogeneous graph transformer on single-cell multi-omics data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studying the outcomes of genetic perturbation based on single-cell RNA-seq data is crucial for understanding genetic regulation of cells. However, the high cost of cellular experiments and single-cell sequencing restrict us from measuring the full combination space of genetic perturbations and cell types. Consequently, a bunch of computational models have been proposed to predict unseen combinations based on existing data. Among them, generative models, e.g. variational autoencoder and diffusion models, have the superiority in capturing the perturbed data distribution, but lack a biologically understandable foundation for generalization. On the other side of the spectrum, Gene Regulation Networks or gene pathway knowledge have been exploited for more reasonable generalization enhancement. Unfortunately, they do not reach a balanced processing of the two data modalities, leading to a degraded fitting ability. Hence, we propose a dual-stream architecture. Before the information from two modalities are merged, the sequencing data are learned with a generative model while three types of knowledge data are comprehensively processed with graph networks and a masked transformer, enforcing a deep understanding of single-modality data, respectively. The benchmark results show an approximate 20% reduction in terms of mean squared error, proving the effectiveness of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.