ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
An Initial Exploratory Examination of the Sensitivity and Specificity of MyCog Mobile Using the Mini-Cog as a Proxy for Suspected Cognitive Impairment.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating digital cognitive tests for clinical use in Alzheimer's disease: A novel framework and scoping review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of MyCog Mobile: development of a parsimonious and clinically interpretable prediction model for mild cognitive impairment.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Optimizing mobile cognitive assessment reduces administration time while maintaining screening accuracy in older adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo help promote early detection of cognitive impairment in primary care, MyCog Mobile was designed as a cognitive screener that can be self-administered remotely on a personal smartphone. We explore the potential utility of MyCog Mobile in primary care by comparing MyCog Mobile to a commonly used screener, Mini-Cog.
methodsA sample of 200 older adults 65+ years (mean age = 72.56 years), completed the Mini-Cog and MyCog Mobile, which includes 2 memory measures and 2 executive functioning measures. A logistic regression model was conducted to predict failing Mini-Cog scores (≤2) based on MyCog Mobile measures.
resultsA total of 20 participants earned a Mini-Cog score ≤2. MyCog Mobile demonstrated an AUC of 0.83 (95% bootstrap CI [0.75, 0.95]), sensitivity of 0.76 (95% bootstrap CI [0.63, 0.97]), and specificity of .88 (95% bootstrap CI [0.63, 0.10]). The subtest Name Matching from MyFaces and MySorting were the only significant predictors of failed Mini-Cogs.
conclusionsMyCog Mobile demonstrated sensitivity and specificity to identify participants who failed the Mini-Cog, and may show promise as a screening tool for cognitive impairment in older adults. Further research is necessary to establish the clinical utility of MyCog Mobile in a larger sample using documented clinical diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.