Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39584563›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

Patients' Ability to Self-Manage Their Surgical Wound to Prevent Wound Complications: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Hannah Groenen, Nathan Bontekoning, Susan Van Dieren, Ricardo G Orsini, Marja A Boermeester, Georgia Tobiano, Anne M Eskes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hannah GroenenAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5264-6716
Nathan BontekoningAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susan Van DierenAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ricardo G OrsiniDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marja A BoermeesterAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3890-8105
Georgia TobianoNational Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5437-0777
Anne M EskesAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo provide insights into postdischarge patients' experiences and preferences regarding surgical wound care education at discharge in the Netherlands.

backgroundPatient involvement in wound care practices postdischarge is beneficial for the prevention of surgical site infections and has become an essential component in reducing the burden on healthcare systems. Surgical wound care discharge education is crucial to achieve this.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted using the 18-item Surgical Wounds And Patient Participation Questionnaire on patients who underwent surgery between January and May 2022. The survey was administered 2 weeks postoperatively.

resultsIn total, 213 patients completed the survey. Most patients preferred verbal instructions about their surgical wound care (n = 146; 84.9%) at the time of discharge, with 52.3% indicating a preference for multiple forms of information. Approximately three-quarters of patients (n = 99; 76.7%) responded that they were able to successfully take care of their wounds at home and 16.3% indicated wound self-care inability.

conclusionOur study highlighted patients' preferences for verbal instructions about their surgical wound care at the time of discharge. Notably, half of the patients expressed a desire for multiple forms of information. Furthermore, we identified gaps in the information provided to patients, indicating areas for improvement in discharge communication. IMPLICATIONS: The identified gaps in surgical wound care discharge education offer opportunities to enhance in-hospital education by aligning it more closely with patient preferences and providing education of topics often missed. This could ultimately improve their ability to self-manage their surgical wound at home. Future research should delve deeper into understanding the factors influencing patients' ability to self-manage their wounds. IMPACT: Despite the acknowledged importance of patient education on surgical wound care, there is limited literature regarding patients' experiences and preferences in this area. The findings of this study highlight patients' preferences for verbal instructions and reveal gaps in the information provided to patients about surgical wound care at the time of discharge. The identified gaps in information provided to surgical patients offer opportunities to enhance in-hospital education by healthcare professionals. REPORTING

methodWe adhered to the STROBE guideline. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Self CareSelf-ManagementSurgical WoundSurgical Wound InfectionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient DischargePatient Education as TopicSurveys and Questionnairesdischarge educationpostoperative wound complicationssurgical site infectionsurgical wound care

Identifiers

PMID39584563
PMCPMC12159385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.