Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39584557›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2025

Induction chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer: long-term results and exploratory analyses of a randomized controlled trial.

Shiliang Liu, Baoqing Chen, Yujia Zhu, Sifen Wang, Xingyuan Cheng, Ruixi Wang, Yonghong Hu, Hui Liu, Qiaoqiao Li, Li Zhang and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02403531 (A Phase II Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy Versus no Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Inoperable Thoracic Esophageal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02403531 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy Versus no Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Inoperable Thoracic Esophageal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorMian XIRan2015 to 2020Enrolled110ConditionsNeoplasmsArmsDocetaxel, Cisplatin, Radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shiliang LiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Baoqing ChenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Yujia ZhuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Sifen WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Xingyuan ChengState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Ruixi WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Yonghong HuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Hui LiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Qiaoqiao LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Li ZhangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Lei ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Mengzhong LiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
Mian XiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8088-0970

Funding

Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation Y-MSDZD2022-0878National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172669National Natural Science Foundation of China 82373214Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2022A1515012483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious results of our trial demonstrated that the addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) failed to significantly improve the response rate or 3-year survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we report long-term results and exploratory analyses to further evaluate the therapeutic value of IC.

methodsPatients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage II-IVA ESCC were randomly assigned to receive IC followed by CRT or CRT alone. The relationship between tumor response to IC and long-term survival was analyzed. Baseline tumor biopsies were collected for RNA-Seq to identify patients who may benefit from IC.

resultsEligible patients were randomized to either the IC + CRT group (n = 55) or the CRT group (n = 55). With a median follow-up of 74.9 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 31.8% in the IC + CRT group and 29.1% in the CRT group (P =.675; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.58-1.43). Similarly, no significant differences were identified in 5-year progression-free survival between groups (30.5% vs 25.5%, P =.508; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.56-1.34). Patients who responded to IC had significantly better survival than nonresponders. A risk-score model incorporating 6 key genes to predict IC efficacy was also constructed.

conclusionsCompared with definitive CRT alone, the addition of IC before CRT still failed to demonstrate superior survival in patients with unselected ESCC, based on long-term follow-up. However, because IC responders were associated with more favorable survival, potential molecular biomarkers were identified for selection of benefit population from IC. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02403531.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaInduction ChemotherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Ageddefinitive chemoradiotherapyEsophageal squamous cell carcinomainduction chemotherapyresponse ratesurvival

Identifiers

PMID39584557
PMCPMC12311283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.