ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2024
Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Clinical Trials Related to Familial Frontotemporal Dementia: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Supporting frontline staff in frontotemporal degeneration research.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Functional Impairment in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia: Cognitive, Behavioral, Personality, and Brain Perfusion Contributions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsFamilial frontotemporal dementia (fFTD) is an inherited neurodegenerative condition characterised by executive dysfunction, impairments in social cognition, behaviour and language. Although no disease-modifying interventions are currently available, several treatments are undergoing clinical trials. This study sought to understand the barriers and facilitators to taking part in such trials, as well as general perceptions of the treatments undergoing trial.
methodTwelve interviews took place with fourteen participants: eight individuals who were genetically at-risk of developing fFTD, two individuals diagnosed with fFTD and four spousal carers. Their views and experiences of clinical trials were explored using thematic analysis.
resultsFive main themes were developed: (1) effects on the individual, (2) implications for others, (3) systemic considerations, (4) the impact of genetic status and disease progression and (5) the role of communication and understanding.
conclusionsThe decision to participate in clinical trials was said to be complex, involving consideration of logistical barriers alongside health implications. Participants identified potential advantages of participating in clinical trials to be direct health benefits and the ability to help others, however risks to participants and their families' physical and psychological wellbeing were also named. Relationships between organisations and participants were consistently considered to be important, with lack of psychological care at various timepoints post diagnosis; unclear communication and expectation-setting; and inadequate organisational collaboration all identified as barriers. Participants indicated that increased health-professional interest in FTD and an associated increase in opportunities would be key facilitators for greater participation in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.