ArticleJournal of health care for the poor and underserved2024
Defining what Matters: Use of Q Methodology to Identify Food Values among People Living with HIV Affected by Food Insecurity.
Article in Journal of health care for the poor and underserved, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/
backgroundTo inform the development of a "food is medicine" (FIM) intervention, the present study aimed to describe how people living with HIV (PLWH) prioritize daily food choices in the context of food insecurity.
methodsInterviews with PLWH experiencing various levels of food insecurity (n=24) were conducted using Q-Methodology. Participants ranked 57 food-choice value statements from "most like me" to "least like me" in a process called forced distribution. We then identified different viewpoints and shared perspectives through factor analysis.
resultsAlthough food cost was a salient value, distinct viewpoints prioritized: 1) creative expression and sensory appeal; 2) disease management within physical limitations; 3) safety, familiarity, household practicality; 4) mainstream convenience; and 5) disease prevention and socioemotional coping. DISCUSSION: Heterogeneous viewpoints on the relative importance of sensory appeal, functional capabilities, family food preferences, and other factors may affect whether and how future FIM participants use foods and related resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.