Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39584151›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

A Survey Study on the Factors Affecting Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Among Postpartum Women in Mother-Infant Separation Wards.

Cheng Cheng Si, Aimei Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cheng Cheng SiKiang Wu Hospital, Kiang Wu Hospital, Macau, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0091-702X
Aimei MaoKiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macau, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Self-efficacy serves as a crucial predictor for successful breastfeeding. The standard practice in maternal wards is mother-baby rooming-in, which is believed to enhance breastfeeding rates post-delivery. However, in certain maternal wards, mother-baby separation continues to occur due to diverse factors. Objectives: The objective of this study is to examine the self-efficacy levels of mothers in mother-infant separation wards and identify the factors that influence their self-efficacy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken in 2022 at a hospital in Macau, involving 290 postpartum women in mother-infant separation wards. A self-designed questionnaire encompassing demographic details and breastfeeding information was utilized. Additionally, the Chinese version of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale (BSES) and the Social Support Scale (SSRS) were employed. SPSS26.0 software was used to analyze the data. Results: The average breastfeeding self-efficacy score among the women was 96.03 ± 23.07, which accounted for 64% of the total score. The factors influencing breastfeeding self-efficacy were ranked based on their impact power as follows: previous experience of breastfeeding, intended length of breastfeeding, employment status, and the number of breastfeeding sessions during hospitalization after childbirth ( Conclusion: The breastfeeding self-efficacy scores of postpartum women were found to be at a moderate level. Mother-infant separation during the postpartum period has an impact on breastfeeding self-efficacy, but the impact can be managed. When developing programs to enhance postpartum mothers' breastfeeding self-efficacy, it is important to consider their individual and social circumstances, as well as the advantages and disadvantages associated with mother-infant separation during the postpartum period.

Indexed as

breastfeedingmother–infant separationpostpartumself-efficacysocial support

Identifiers

PMID39584151
PMCPMC11583267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.