Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39584098›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

General practitioners' perspectives on targeted breast ultrasound as primary diagnostic test in women with focal breast complaints: An interview study.

C C N Siebers, L Appelman, M Palm, J C M Van Zelst, R M Mann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C C N SiebersDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
L AppelmanDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
M PalmDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
J C M Van ZelstGeneral practitioner at General Practice Geffen, Geffen, the Netherlands.
R M MannDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The high diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound opens possibilities to shift towards an initial ultrasound approach for the evaluation of focal breast complaints in women, with only additional DBT in case of unclear or suspicious ultrasound findings. As general practitioners (GPs) are important stakeholders in the diagnostic pathway, this study focuses on GPs perspective on ultrasound as primary diagnostic imaging test, as well as the GP referral process. Methods: Sixteen Dutch GPs were interviewed on the referral process and their perceived barriers and facilitators of initial ultrasound diagnostics in women presenting with focal breast complaints. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Results: Thematic analysis identified themes related to 1) the routine breast consult ( Conclusion: Participants seemed to welcome ultrasound-only diagnostics for the evaluation of women's focal breast complaints, emphasizing multiple benefits for both the patients and GPs. They, however, also addressed various challenges that should be taken into consideration when actually practicing an initial ultrasound approach.

Identifiers

PMID39584098
PMCPMC11583702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.