ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2024
Leveraging 3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Accurate Recognition and Localization of Ankle Fractures.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Automated Computed Tomography Classification of Posterior Malleolar Fractures for a Standardized Diagnostic Framework.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning for radiographic differentiation between lateral malleolar avulsion fractures and subfibular ossicles.iScience · 2026Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Preoperative Planning in Surgery: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ankle fractures are common injuries with substantial implications for patient mobility and quality of life. Traditional imaging methods, while standard, have limitations in detecting subtle fractures and distinguishing them from complex bone structures. The advent of 3D Convolutional Neural Networks (3D-CNNs) offers a promising avenue for enhancing the accuracy and reliability of ankle fracture diagnoses. Methods: In this study, we acquired 1453 high-resolution CT scans and processed them through three distinct 3D-CNN models: 3D-Mobilenet, 3D-Resnet101, and 3D-EfficientNetB7. Our approach involved meticulous preprocessing of images, including normalization and resampling, followed by a systematic comparative evaluation of the models based on accuracy, Area Under the Curve (AUC), and recall metrics. Additionally, the integration of Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) provided visual interpretability of the models' predictive focus points. Results: The 3D-EfficientNetB7 model outperformed the other models, achieving an accuracy of 0.91 and an AUC of 0.94 after 20 training epochs. It demonstrated particularly effective in the accurate detection and localization of subtle and complex fractures. Grad-CAM visualizations confirmed the model's focus on clinically relevant areas, aligning with expert assessments and enhancing trust in automated diagnostics. Spatial localization techniques were pivotal in improving interpretability, offering clear visual guidance for pinpointing fracture sites. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the effectiveness of the 3D-EfficientNetB7 model in diagnosing ankle fractures, supported by robust performance metrics and enhanced visualization tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.