Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583998›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

A simple and cost-effective extraction for piscine environmental DNA metabarcoding using guanidine hydrochloride method.

Muhammad Hilman Fu'adil Amin, Hyun-Woo Kim, Amy Yee-Hui Then, Nur Indradewi Oktavitri, Ah Ran Kim, Soo Rin Lee, Manikya Pramudya, Sapto Andriyono, Annisa Selvia Widyar Iswara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammad Hilman Fu'adil AminDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universitas Airlangga. Jl. Dr. Ir. H. Soekarno, Mulyorejo, Surabaya 60115, East Java, Indonesia.
Hyun-Woo KimDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universitas Airlangga. Jl. Dr. Ir. H. Soekarno, Mulyorejo, Surabaya 60115, East Java, Indonesia.
Amy Yee-Hui ThenInstitute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Nur Indradewi OktavitriEnvironmental Engineering Study Program, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universitas Airlangga. Jl. Dr. Ir. H. Soekarno, Mulyorejo, Surabaya 60115, East Java, Indonesia.
Ah Ran KimMarine Integrated Biomedical Technology Center, The National Key Research Institutes in Universities, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, South Korea.
Soo Rin LeeMarine Integrated Biomedical Technology Center, The National Key Research Institutes in Universities, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, South Korea.
Manikya PramudyaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universitas Airlangga. Jl. Dr. Ir. H. Soekarno, Mulyorejo, Surabaya 60115, East Java, Indonesia.
Sapto AndriyonoDepartment of Marine, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Annisa Selvia Widyar IswaraDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universitas Airlangga. Jl. Dr. Ir. H. Soekarno, Mulyorejo, Surabaya 60115, East Java, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a valuable tool for assessing aquatic biodiversity, but the high cost and complexity of DNA extraction pose challenges for widespread adoption, especially in developing countries. This study presents a cost-effective eDNA extraction method using a guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) buffer, proteinase-K digestion, and isopropanol precipitation to improve the detection of fish communities. Comparison with the Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit using MiFish universal primers showed that the GuHCl protocol detected more fish species in freshwater samples, with comparable performance in relative read abundance metrics. However, the GuHCl method exhibited higher PCR inhibition in brackish samples, likely due to salinity and natural inhibitors. The results suggest that the GuHCl-based method is a viable alternative, offering enhanced sensitivity for low-abundance species in freshwater samples and cost savings. This protocol facilitates large-scale eDNA metabarcoding for ecological studies and conservation management efforts.•The GuHCl protocol identified a greater diversity of fish species in freshwater samples than the Qiagen kit, but detected fewer species in brackish water samples.•Both extraction methods demonstrated robust positive correlations in metrics of relative read abundance.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEnvironmental DNA extraction using guanidine hydrochloride for fish metabarcodingEnvironmental DNA isolationFish speciesGuanidine hydrochlorideMetabarcoding

Identifiers

PMID39583998
PMCPMC11585735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.