Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583988›Full record

ArticleChildren and youth services review2024

Assessing Childhood Community Experiences.

Samantha Addante, Jacob D Kraft, Déjà Clement, Gina Erato, Ashley Quigley, Mira Armans, Kristin Fields, Vanessa Oliphant, LaRicka Wingate, Lucia Ciciolla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children and youth services review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samantha AddanteDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK 74078.
Jacob D KraftDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK 74078.
Déjà ClementDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK 74078.
Gina EratoDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK 74078.
Ashley QuigleyDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK 74078.
Mira ArmansDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK 74078.
Kristin FieldsDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK 74078.
Vanessa OliphantDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK 74078.
LaRicka WingateDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK 74078.
Lucia CiciollaDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, 116 Psychology Building, Stillwater, OK 74078.

Funding

The Impact of Maternal Adversity and Attachment Security on Infant Stress Reactivity: Prenatal Epigenetic PathwaysP20GM109097 · NIGMS · OSU CENTER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jason A. Avery · 2016 to 2026
$22.8M
Training in Child/Adolescent Biobehavioral HIV ResearchT32MH078788 · NIMH · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI LARRY K BROWN · 2007 to 2026
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109097NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH078788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Community-level childhood experiences make up important aspects of early life that are associated with long-term health outcomes. However, to date, there have been no validated measures that assess community-level experiences during childhood. Thus, we aimed to develop and validate a measure that would assess community-level experiences associated with both risk and resilience. Methods: Data were collected from 577 undergraduate participants (68.7% female). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic strategies were used to examine the factor structure of the Childhood Community Experiences Scale (CCES) comprised of the Community Risk Scale and the Community Protective Scale. Convergent validity and predictive utility of the CCES with existing measures of individual risk and resilience and adult psychosocial functioning were also examined. Results: Results indicated a 5-factor solution for the Community Risk Scale and a 6-factor solution for the Community Protective Scale to fit the data best. Further, results suggest the convergent validity and predictive utility of the CCES with measures of adult psychosocial functioning. Conclusion: This measure allows for a brief, self-report assessment that can be used to assess childhood community-level risk and protective factors.

Indexed as

Childhood adversityCommunity experiencesCommunity protectionCommunity riskFactor analysisResilience

Identifiers

PMID39583988
PMCPMC11584053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.