ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024
Underrepresentation of women in cardiovascular disease clinical Trials-What's in a Name?
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Consideration of sex/gender aspects in cardiovascular clinical trials.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Pooled it
- Redesigning cardiovascular medicine around sex differences.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Recent highlights from the International Journal of Cardiology Heart & Vasculature: cardiometabolic disease.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women worldwide. Yet, women are often underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials. Trial characteristics may influence the participation of women. For instance, trials are often entitled with an acronym, which might be perceived as gendered. We aimed to investigate if the perceived gender of the acronym and other trial characteristics affect the representation of female patients in cardiovascular trials. Methods: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials in cardiovascular disease named with an acronym. Cardiovascular patients (n = 148) scored the perceived gender of the acronym of 148 identified trials. Prevalence ratios (PR) were calculated with Poisson regression to link trial characteristics to representation of female patients in the trials. Results: In 62 % of trials, female patients were underrepresented relative to the disease population. There was no improvement over time in proportion of trials with adequate representation. A third of acronyms was classified as gendered. The perceived gender did not affect representation of female patients (PR 1.01; 95% CI 0.95 - 1.08; P = 0.68). A woman as first and/or last author (PR 1.22; 95% CI 1.07 - 1.38; P = 0.002) and recruitment in an outpatient setting (PR 1.15; 95% CI 1.02 - 1.29; P = 0.01) were associated with a higher prevalence of adequate representation of female patients. Conclusions: Representation of female patients in cardiovascular trials does not depend on the perceived gender of the trial acronym but is improved in trials under female leadership in out-patient settings. Our findings may direct efforts towards increasing representation of female patients in cardiovascular trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.