Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583981›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024

Underrepresentation of women in cardiovascular disease clinical Trials-What's in a Name?

A E Spiering, A M L N van Ommen, J E Roeters van Lennep, Y Appelman, K Reue, N C Onland-Moret, H M den Ruijter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. ​Consideration of sex/gender aspects in cardiovascular clinical trials.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A E SpieringLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
A M L N van OmmenLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J E Roeters van LennepDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Y AppelmanDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
K ReueDepartment of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States.
N C Onland-MoretDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
H M den RuijterLaboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

The impact of estrogen receptor alpha on cardiomyocellular metabolism and healthU54HL170326 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Hooman Allayee · 2023 to 2026
$7.5M
A sex-biased obesity gene on the X chromosomeR01DK143368 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Karen Reue · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL170326NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK143368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women worldwide. Yet, women are often underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials. Trial characteristics may influence the participation of women. For instance, trials are often entitled with an acronym, which might be perceived as gendered. We aimed to investigate if the perceived gender of the acronym and other trial characteristics affect the representation of female patients in cardiovascular trials. Methods: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials in cardiovascular disease named with an acronym. Cardiovascular patients (n = 148) scored the perceived gender of the acronym of 148 identified trials. Prevalence ratios (PR) were calculated with Poisson regression to link trial characteristics to representation of female patients in the trials. Results: In 62 % of trials, female patients were underrepresented relative to the disease population. There was no improvement over time in proportion of trials with adequate representation. A third of acronyms was classified as gendered. The perceived gender did not affect representation of female patients (PR 1.01; 95% CI 0.95 - 1.08; P = 0.68). A woman as first and/or last author (PR 1.22; 95% CI 1.07 - 1.38; P = 0.002) and recruitment in an outpatient setting (PR 1.15; 95% CI 1.02 - 1.29; P = 0.01) were associated with a higher prevalence of adequate representation of female patients. Conclusions: Representation of female patients in cardiovascular trials does not depend on the perceived gender of the trial acronym but is improved in trials under female leadership in out-patient settings. Our findings may direct efforts towards increasing representation of female patients in cardiovascular trials.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseClinical trialsFemale authorshipFemale representationPerceived genderTrial acronym

Identifiers

PMID39583981
PMCPMC11584672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.