ArticleJournal of LGBT youth2024
Protective factors associated with reduced substance use and depression among gender minority teens.
Article in Journal of LGBT youth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Protective Factors in the LGBTIQ+ Adolescent Experience: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gender minority (GM) students are at high risk for substance use and depression. This study explores the role of protective factors in reducing rates of substance use and depression based on high school surveys. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between exposures and outcomes. Youth completed surveys in 2018 (n=16,288) and in 2021 (n=10,792). GM students reported exposure to protective factors less frequently than their cisgender peers: good financial status (88.6% v 96.5% v in 2018 and 95% v 97.8% in 2021), feeling a sense of school/community membership, (mean score 2.7 v 3.0 in 2018 and 2.6 v 3.0 in 2021) or having two or more caring adults in their life (61.5% v 79.7% v in 2018 and 64.2% v. 80.6% in 2021). GM youth experienced risk factors more often than their peers including bias-based bullying (mean score: 0.6 v 0.2 in 2018, 0.5 v. 0.2 in 2021); peer victimization (0.5 v. 0.2 in 2018, 0.3 v 0.1 in 2021), and homelessness/foster care exposure (32.8% v 10.8% in 2018 and 15.8% v. 6.6% in 2021). Several factors mitigated depression and substance use among GM students. GM youth experienced these protective factors less frequently than their peers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.